Skip to main content

The Dark Side of LED Bulb

Dear EarthTalk:

Are there health or environmental concerns with LED bulb, which may soon replace CFL as the green friendly light bulb of choice? Mari-Louise Via Email.

Indeed, LED lighting does seems to  be the wave of the future right now, given the mercury content and light quality issues with the current king-of-the-hill of green bulbs, the CFL.  LEDs use significantly less energy than even CFL, and do not contain mercury. And they are becoming economically competitive with CFL at the point of purchase while yielding superior quality lighting and energy bill saving down the line.

But LEDs do have a dark side.

“A study published in the late 2010 in the journal Environment Science and Technology found that LEDs contain lead, arsenic and a dozen other potentially dangerous substances. LEDs are touted as the next generation of lighting,”  says Oladele Ogunseitan, one of the researchers behinds the study and chair of the UC-Irvine’s Department of Population Health & Disease Prevention. “But as we try to find better products that do not deplete energy resources or contribute to global warming, we have to be vigilant about toxivity hazards…..”

Ogunseitan and other researchers tested several types of LEDs, including those used as Christmas lights, traffic lights, car headlights and brake lights.

What did they find?

Soe of the worst offenders were low-intensity red LEDs, which were found to contain up to eight times the amount of lead, a known neurotoxin, allowed by California state law and which, according to researchers, “exhibit significant cancer and noncancer potentials due to the high content of arsenic and lead.” Meanwhile, white LEDs contain the least lead, but still harbor large amounts of nickel, another heavy metal that causes allergic reactions in as many as one in five of us upon exposure. And the copper found in some LEDs can pose an environmental threat if it accumulates in the rivers and lakes where it can poison aquatic life.

Ogunseitan adds that while breaking open a single LED and breathing in its fumes would not likely cause cancer, our bodies hardly need more toxic substances floating around, as the combined effects could be a disease trigger. If any LEDs breaks at home, Ogunseitan recommends sweeping then up while wearing gloves and a mask, and disposing of the debris – and even the broom – as hazardous waste. Furthermore, crews dispatched to clean up car crashes or broken traffic lights should wear protective clothing and handle material as hazardous waste. LEDs are currently not considered toxic by law and can be disposed of in regular landfills.

Accordin to Ogunseitan, LED makes could easily reduce the concentrations of heavy metals in their products or even redesign them with truly safer materials, especially if state or federal regulators required them to do so.

“Every day we do not have a law that says you can not replace an unsafe product with another unsafe product, we are putting people’s lives at risk,” he concludes. “And it is a preventable risk.”

Of course, we all need some kind of lighting in our lives and, despite their flaws, LEDs may still be the best choice regarding lighting quality, energy use and environment footprint. That said, researchers are busy at work on even newer lighting technologies that could render even today’s green choices obsolete.

This is funny.

Original UC-Irvine Study.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.